ANALISIS KINERJA INLISLITE V.3.1 SEBAGAI SARANA TEMU KEMBALI PERPUSTAKAAN KEMENTERIAN PANRB

Nur Sanny Rahmawati, Nina Mayesti

Abstract


This article discusses the performance analysis of INLISLite which is used in the Kementerian PANRB’s Library as a retrieval system. This article aims to identify the performance of the INLISLite used in the Kementerian PANRB’s Library. The approach used in this research is descriptive qualitative with participatory observation methods. Furthermore, the aspects analyzed in the object of this study are recall, precision, and response time from the INLISLite of the Kementerian PANRB’s Library. The results obtained by the recall value ranged from 0.928 to 1, while the precision value was in the range 0.76 to 1 which was obtained through a simple search. Additionally, the average response time obtained based on searching through collection titles is 0.206 seconds. Meanwhile, for tracing through the subject, the response time obtained was 0.214 seconds. Even though the system is quite effective, there are still shortcomings in terms of features such as the absence of live chat with librarians so that it does not provide alternative options for users to communicate.

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Chowdury, G.G. 1999. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. Lon-don: Library Association Publishing.

Francis, Caroline M. 2006. How Infor-mation Retrieval Systems Impact on Designers’ Searching Strategies. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.

Lal, Niranjan, Samimul Qamar, dan Savita Shiwani. 2016. “Information Retrieval System and Challenges with Dataspace.” International Journal of Computer Applications vol. 147(8). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306124580_Information_Retrieval_System_and_challenges_with_Dataspace

Junaedi, Jusa. 2017. “Evaluasi Sistem Online Public Access Catalog Per-pustakaan Umum Daerah Provinsi DKI Jakarta, Cikini.” Journal Of Documentation And Information Sci-ence (JODIS) vol. 1(1), pp. 22-26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33505/jodis.v1i1.20

Perpustakaan Nasional Republik Indone-sia. 2016. Tentang INLISLite Versi 3. https://inlislite.perpusnas.go.id/?read=tentanginlislitev3

Rif’an, Moh. 2018. “Komparasi Evaluasi OPAC Perpustakaan Universitas In-donesia dan Research Repository Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogya-karta.” Jurnal Publis vol. 2(2). http://journal.umpo.ac.id/index.php/PUBLIS/article/download/1154/890.

Salton, Gerard dan Michael McGill. 1983. Introduction to Modern Infor-mation Retrieval. Amerika Serikat: McGraw Hill.

Saufa, Arina F., dan J. Wahyu. 2017. “Evaluasi Sistem Temu Kembali In-formasi KOHA di Perpustakaan Uni-versitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta (UMS).” Khizanah Al-Hikmah : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi, dan Kearsipan vol. 5(2), pp. 140-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/kah.v5i2a1

Yusuf, A. Muri. 2019. Metode Penelitian: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Penelitian Gabungan. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/jib.v5i1.110

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Imam Bonjol: Kajian Ilmu Informasi dan Perpustakaan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Imam Bonjol Padang

Alamat: Kampus I Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Imam Bonjol Padang - Pascasarjana, Jalan Jenderal Sudirman No.15, Padang Pasir, Padang Barat, Kp. Jao, Kec. Padang Bar., Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat 25153

Email: admin@journal.pustakauinib.ac.id